(Ed channelling)
Oxal
We are those of Oxal. We greet this group in the love and the light of the one infinite Creator. We have visited your group before and find its vibrations to be coherent with our expression. We hope to offer answers to your queries, with love at the root of your seeking. We communicate now.
Questioner F
Hello Oxal, I had a query pertaining to language, and [the instrument] spoke earlier of the recent findings on language and sound. It has come to my attention that the ancient people of Iran who called their leader ‘Shah’ also used to call their land ‘The Essassani’. A channeller by the name of Daryl Anka also claims to channel [a being from] a far distant land called Essassani, and they call their star ‘Shah’. Within the limits of free will could you explain the synchronicities between the languages, the different eras, times, and races… but also the reason for it? Is it something that we should look at more closely? Thank you.
We are those of Oxal. We appreciate this query; there is much depth to be understood here. The societal complex you mention has very old roots with its position as a focal point of human evolution.
[pause]
We are those of Oxal and we apologise. The area that you speak of has borne witness to many changes, and the connections you highlighted are the remainder of these societal experiences. When you speak of language, the vibratory sound complexes you use to communicate all have roots gained from an evolution, the understanding of vibration and sound. This has unfortunately been lost. The remnants of this more universal tongue can still be found, as sound and communication in this way is a universal aspect.
Many developments and distortions away from this elemental and archaic knowledge of what sound and language is capable of… this has developed mostly through the occult / elite power systems. Other areas that are not as wrapped in this shroud – such as the Sanskrit language – contain far more of these natural vibratory units.
We hope that this has given some context. If you would like to ask any further questions to clarify?
Thank you. In a comparative analysis with the older languages such as Hebrew, Sanskrit, and the languages channelled by John D, is there a congruency that a more poignant original language can at least be studied, if not used?
We are those of Oxal, and we hope to clarify further. When sound is produced by means of communication, or the sound that animals instinctively produce, through to more complex use of sounds such as singing or the production of music… each sound has its own structure and shape. A ‘word’ is a real energetic structure. This movement of energy is one of the means that communication is possible. The variation in how emotion affects the expression of a word or sound adds a whole extra resonant layer to that communication. The more layers that are added, more symbolic meanings and multi- dimensional concepts can be portrayed in such structures. Leading to a sacred geometry whereby sounds and shapes fit into an almost-universal structure and mapping.
The specific sound vibrations you call vowels are vitally important in this universal language as they create harmony between the other energies. These are the units that were universally used here on Earth originally… as before language, the sounds themselves had clearer meaning. But again, this has been lost over time as languages have become more distorted. The idea of the ‘Tower of Babel’ and languages being mixed and confused has happened independently. The idea that all humans started with one language is not true. But all the languages – that when actually developed – had the same understanding of tone and structure.
We hope this has given… we apologise and would say a word on the one you call John D:
His language is channelled but holds much distortion and is not complete in its understandings. With that addition we hope that we have answered your query, and ask if there’s anything else we may address?
Yes, thank you. According to what you’re describing, the sounds we make equal (upon layering) a form of sacred geometry. In that case it would mean that a sacred geometric form should be able to be reverse engineered into a sound. Is that correct, and if so, could you elaborate?
We are those of Oxal, and we applaud your keen awareness. Many languages (as they are developed) use this energetic patterning within the sounds that are used. The difficulty is that the shapes and symbology picked does not always represent the same vibratory sound complex associated with the symbol. So, the tone and sound of the letter may not necessarily always match the symbol. But the sound itself (these ubiquitous vowel structures specifically) will fit into the same geometric patterning. So, you could extrapolate the philosophical meaning, or the spiritual meaning underlying that structure. The associated energies will be the same structure; the symbol may not represent that. We hope this has given you some explanation, and it is a wonderful idea as a form of expression.
[Are] there any further queries we could answer at this time?
Yes, thank you for your answer… I want to allow someone else to ask a question if they have a follow-up.
Questioner S
Thanks F, thanks Oxal. You mentioned in a previous response just now about layers and geometric shapes, and it made me think of when learning the piano, you get taught something called the ‘circle of fifths’. It made me think of layers being maybe separate notes that form a resonant harmonic chord, and if you plotted them out on the circle of fifths, they make geometric shapes. Is that something that could be used?
We are those of Oxal, and again this is an astute observation. When analysing the specific patterning of each letter (or specifically the complex of vibrations you call a word), the notes as you describe are not strictly the same shapes, but this would provide a good way to visualise. The difference would be that you could say a word at any note in that range; the shape of the word would be the same but the notes and harmonics by which you express it could be very different. This is itself one of the layers. We hope this has helped but it is still a good route of investigation.
Can we clarify?
Thank you. Are there any connections between these ancient sounds and languages and anything that we might hear [within] classical music?
We are those of Oxal and we thank you; this leads to a wider query. With (as you describe) classical music, its mastery comes from understanding the relationship between sound and emotion. This is in itself a manipulation of those shapes within sound to affect the emotional aspects via vibration. Each chakra and energy system in your body has a certain vibrational attunement by which music can affect the vehicle and mind with clarity that words can sometimes not express. This in itself is a powerful route of seeking, as vibration is core to understanding the unity in all, and its power lies in that deeper – more undistorted – part of the self.
We hope this has helped?
Yes, that was great, and I just had one final follow-up on this topic which was to do with how we can use these sounds in a positive way? Personally, I like to use the Sanskrit mantras and to sing them out loud, because I find that resonates with me. However, I have heard that they can be just as powerful (if not more powerful) if you actually say them within your mind, and you don’t necessarily have to sound the words. I’m wondering whether you could speak on the difference between vocalising the words and just saying them within your own mind?
We are those of Oxal, and we thank you for this question. The reason that Sanskrit brings such spiritual connection is precisely its expansion of vowels; many of its letters are expanded versions of these same vibrational patterns. The act of resonating and projecting sound out from you has more powerful effects than you know inside your illusion. Whereas doing the same mantras and energetic work internally creates just as much change in time/space as the vibration being expressed causes in space/time. We would say it is a good practice to do both.
Yes, that was perfect, thank you. I’ll step aside if anyone else wants to ask a question.
We are those of Oxal, and we thank you for allowing us this opportunity of service. We thank all of you for your dedication, and we hope to see you again. We leave you all in the light and the love of the One Infinite Creator, Adonai.